Ripples

Create.Communicate.Educate.Evolve.Learn.Lead

By

One Tool to Rule Them All

I was in search for a multi-tool, a Swiss Army Knife. A tool that had it all, one-stop shopping. Why? Because I was operating under the assumption that parents/learners needed, demanded it. But wasn’t my assumption based on just a few loud squeaky wheels? In life outside the classroom we have various tools for various jobs, various recipes for various occasions, even various forms of exercise depending on need/want.

 

I remember some years back students coming to me fresh at the beginning of the year and all they wanted to do was slideshows, they’d ask, “Can we do a Google Slide? The danger of “One Story”. The danger of one platform. We talk of personalization and differentiation and then we give them standardization, TPT, Slidesmania, Seesaw, Google Classroom, Bitmoji classrooms, etc. where all the illustrations and fonts seem vaguely similar. I love Google Classroom, it’s my USPS, my logistics— delivers and receives.  Seesaw is great for parent communication and blogging. OneNote Class Notebooks almost has it all, especially with Immersive Reader but I still need Google Sites, Flipgrid, WeVideo, Adobe Spark.

 

This summer we were shopping for a chair for my wife who had developed severe back pain during Emergency Remote Teaching in the Spring of 2020. Ended up we got the one that had the most ways to individually adjust it for her comfort, no one size fits all. We don’t all shop at Walmart, we don’t all buy Crest. Variety is the spice of life they say.

 

This is one thing I like about Eduprotocols they give me the foundation and frame but then it is up to my learners and I to actually build the house. And no we will not use just a screwdriver.

 

Of course, it would be easier for me to just use one tool like Seesaw for everything, but is that the goal? And wouldn’t you get tired of having oatmeal as your staple every day? Here are oatmeal and meatballs, oatmeal parmigiana, oatmeal sous vide. Ridiculous sounding isn’t it.

By

It Has Become Complicated

After more than 25 years as a teacher, I am finally realizing my dream of being a 3rd-grade teacher. So, one of my first thoughts was to build my classroom library. I wanted to create a diverse, relevant library with many genres of literature and many nonfiction topics. I received many donations from my fellow teachers. I asked my school librarian for any pointers and she was very helpful and also gave me some websites and booklists. I also reached out to our district literacy and diversity staff. My next stop was to check with my PLN on Twitter as well as a few of my known sources such as Donalyn Miller, Pernille Ripp, and Jerry Blumengarten. This journey lead me to these sites:

Ready-To-Go: Favorites, Grade 3

NCTE Statement on Classroom Libraries

Creating a Diverse Classroom Library-Edutopia

ASCD-Creating a Classroom Library Together

15 Diverse Books for Kids to Include In Your Classroom Library

Checklist: 8 Steps to Creating a Diverse Book Collection

It’s Not Complicated

 

and then I ran smack dab into this:

“King & King”— and Teacher Who Read It—Under Fire In North Carolina

 

So now before I spend any more time and possibly some money on my classroom library I need guidance.


I’m wondering if my school board has any current policies that I might run afoul of in my endeavor to provide opportunities for my learners to increase the breadth and volume of their reading lives?

 

 

By

How(what)-When-Why? Revisited

How(what)-When-Why? was originally posted just about a year ago on 06.28.2021. Since that time an increase in the politicization of the classroom has occurred. After I read Joanne Jacobs post, “Behind the classroom door” I was struck by these points: “The debate misses a key point, writes Robert Pondiscio, who’s now at the American Enterprise Institute. We don’t know what’s happening in our classrooms. Teachers are do-it-yourselfers when it comes to learning materials.” “Teachers’ favorite sites are Google, Pinterest and the lesson-sharing website Teachers Pay Teachers, writes Pondiscio. It’s a “curriculum bazaar.” Quality is uneven, at best”.  And I would agree. So how then in such an environment can equity be achieved? And what is a teacher to do? And I know why we turn to such grab-n’-go sources, we don’t have time.

As I pointed out in How(what)-When-Why? states provide standards for learning and I listed all of the standards from my state for my 5th-grade learners. I now provide some further evidence for thought.

Exhibit #1

“Pursuant to Substitute House Bill (SHB) 1813 and based on support from educators, OSPI’s
Curriculum Advisory and Review Committee, and statewide computer science stakeholders, I
hereby adopt the Computer Science K–12 Learning Standards.” this was signed by then State Superintendent of Public Instruction, Randy Dorn.
Exhibit #2
Computer Science Is an Essential Academic Subject
The mission of the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) is to “provide funding,
resources, tools, data and technical assistance that enable educators to ensure students succeed in our
public schools, are prepared to access post-secondary training and education, and are equipped to
thrive in their careers and lives.”
Exhibit #3
Washington State Learning Goals, Standards, and Outcomes
Learning standards are for all of us: students, principals, administrators, decision-makers, community
partners, teachers, and families. They help define what is important for students to know and be able to
do as they progress through school. Standards help ensure that students acquire the skills and
knowledge they need to achieve personal and academic success.Standards also provide an avenue for
promoting consistency in what is taught to students across our state—from district to district, school to
school, and classroom to classroom.
Exhibit #4
The Washington State K–12 Learning Standards are the required elements of instruction and are
worded broadly enough to allow for local decision-making. Depending on school resources and
community norms, instructional activities may vary.
Exhibit #5
Equity is embodied in the standards through both concepts and practices. For example, Impacts of
Computing is a core concept aimed at promoting ideas about equity. Fostering an Inclusive and Diverse
Computing Culture is an example of a core practice that promotes equity in K–12 computer science.
Equity in computer science is not just about an equitable K–12 Computer Science Framework to
implement the standards, but also about subsequent initiatives such as curriculum development,
teacher preparation, access to tools and equipment, and integrated instruction.
Exhibit #6
The standards are meant to establish a baseline literacy in computer science for all students and provide

guidance for designing curriculum, assessments, and teacher preparation programs.

From kindergarten through 12th grade, students will develop new approaches to problem-solving that harness the power of
computational thinking, while not only becoming users, but creators of computing technology.
Exhibit #7
Implementation of Grade-Level Bands
The grade-level bands associated with each learning standard are intended to provide teachers with the
confidence to provide age-appropriate and accurate information and instruction that progresses in
complexity from grade level to grade level. Competency for one grade level serves as a foundation for
attaining competency of the bands for the next grade level. Teachers can use the grade-level bands as
starting points for instruction and as checkpoints to ensure that the learning standards are taught and
applied to the student’s ability.
Teachers can use grade-level bands to:
Develop lesson plans
Establish specific and intentional learning objectives to guide teaching and learning
Conduct ongoing formative and summative assessments to check student understanding
and efficacy of instruction
Integrate computational thinking into their curriculum
Create an equitable environment
All curriculum in Washington is decided locally, within each district. Districts will determine how to
incorporate the Computer Science K–12 Learning Standards into each grade level and integrate them
into relevant high school courses leading to graduation.
An understanding of the fundamentals of computer science and its underlying problem-solving
methodology of computational thinking is a valuable skill in our global economy. Not every student
should become a computer scientist, but all students should have the opportunity to explore and create
with computing. Learning standards are the foundation for what students should know and be able to
do. How this learning occurs is up to districts to develop and teachers to impart every day in every
classroom.
Exhibit #8 The standards for Grade Band 3-5
Identifier
Level 1B: 3–5
1B-CS-01
Describe how internal and external parts of computing devices function to form a system.
(P. 7.2)
1B-CS-02
Model how computer hardware and software work together as a system to accomplish
tasks. (P. 4.4)
1B-CS-03
Determine potential solutions to solve simple hardware and software problems using
common troubleshooting strategies. (P. 6.2)
1B-NI-04
Model how information is broken down into smaller pieces, transmitted as packets
through multiple devices over networks and the Internet, and reassembled at the
destination. (P. 4.4)
1B-NI-05
Discuss real-world cybersecurity problems and how personal information can be
protected. (P. 3.1)
1B-DA-06
Organize and present collected data visually to highlight relationships and support a
claim. (P. 7.1)
1B-DA-07
Use data to highlight or propose cause-and-effect relationships, predict outcomes, or
communicate an idea. (P. 7.1)
1B-AP-08
Compare and refine multiple algorithms for the same task and determine which is the
most appropriate. (P. 6.3, P. 3.3)
1B-AP-09
Create programs that use variables to store and modify data. Variables are used to store
and modify data. (P. 5.2)
1B-AP-10
Create programs that include sequences, events, loops, and conditionals. (P. 5.2)
1B-AP-11
Decompose (break down) problems into smaller, manageable subproblems to facilitate
the program development process. (P. 3.2)
1B-AP-12
Modify, remix, or incorporate portions of an existing program into one’s own work, to
develop something new or add more advanced features. (P. 5.3)
1B-AP-13
Use an iterative process to plan the development of a program by including others’
perspectives and considering user preferences. (P. 1.1, P. 5.1)
1B-AP-14
Observe intellectual property rights and give appropriate attribution when creating or
remixing programs. (P. 5.2, P. 7.3)
1B-AP-15
Test and debug (identify and fix errors) a program or algorithm to ensure it runs as
intended. (P. 6.1, P. 6.2)
1B-AP-16
Take on varying roles, with teacher guidance, when collaborating with peers during the
design, implementation, and review stages of program development. (P. 2.2)
1B-AP-17
Describe choices made during program development using code comments,
presentations, and demonstrations. (P. 7.2)
1B-IC-18
Discuss computing technologies that have changed the world, and express how those
technologies influence, and are influenced by, cultural practices. (P. 3.1)
1B-IC-19
Brainstorm ways to improve the accessibility and usability of technology products for the
diverse needs and wants of users. (P. 1.2)
1B-IC-20
Seek diverse perspectives for the purpose of improving computational artifacts. (P. 1.1)
1B-IC-21
Use public domain or creative commons media, and refrain from copying or using
material created by others without permission. (P. 7.3)

Now focus on that last sentence, “How this learning occurs is up to districts to develop and teachers to impart every day in every

classroom.” This is exactly why ” Teachers are do-it-yourselfers when it comes to learning materials.”. 
If I am required to teach to these standards, by law, and if my district does not provide me with the curriculum then I am left to fend for myself.
I used to greatly appreciate this entrepreneurial aspect of teaching.  Now it is fraught with danger in that I have no recourse should my teaching practices be assailed from any side in today’s political environment. I chose to focus on Computer Science purposefully thinking that it might be a topic in which fewer political opinions prevail. However, you may want to peruse the Social Studies Standards for a document more open to politicizing.

Will it be enough to maintain that I in good faith was merely attempting to educate my charges as best I could? Since I have not received any guidance to “incorporate the Computer Science K–12 Learning Standards into” my grade level should I ignore the law and merely only teach the curricula, in this case—none,  which the district provides?

By

How(what)-When-Why?

How (What), When, and Why? 

 

Once again, I am amid the Summer Planning Institute. This is a self-imposed, self-created institute I have attended for the past 25 years. The goals of this institute are based on this quote: “Every teacher needs to improve, not because they are not good enough, but because they can be even better.” Dylan Wiliam

Yet once again, I have come up against the above three questions. 

 

How do the learners in my charge become proficient in all these standards and with fidelity to these curricula (what)? 

STATE STANDARDS 

Art State Standards (2017) Media  Theatre Visual Arts 

Computer Science K-12 Standards (2018) Grade 3-5 

EdTech K-12 Standards (2018) Grade 3-5 

Financial Education Standards (2016) Grades K-5 

Math-Common Core State Standards Operations & Algebraic Thinking  Number & Operations- Base Ten  Number & Operations – Fractions  Measurement & Data  Geometry  Mathematical Practices (2014) 

Reading – Common Core State Standards Literature  Informational Text  Foundational Skills (2014) 

Science - Next Generation Science Standards 5th Grade Guide (2013) 

SEL (Social, Emotional Learning) Standards (2019) 

Social Studies-WA State Standards (09.17.19) 

Speaking & Listening-CCSS (2014) 

Writing-CCSS Language- CCSS (2014) 

   

DISTRICT CURRICULUM 

 Reading/Language – FPC: RMLIRASR, IR, GR & BC 

Writing/Language – Units of Study 

Spelling – Spelling Strategies and Patterns 

Math – EPS Scope & Sequence 

ScienceSTEMScopes 

Keyboarding – Typing Agent 

Social Studies – None 

Speaking/Listening – None 

Social-Emotional Learning – Zones of Regulation 


  WHEN - (constraints) 

District Calendar (180 days)

2019-2020 Elementary Assessment Calendar

Band/Orchestra – most learners 2 hours/week 

Safety Patrol – arrives late and leaves early 

Recess 3x/day

Math Club – some learners and amount of time varies

Committee Meetings, IEP Meetings are before/after school

*Early Release every Wednesday (some Fridays) dismissal at 1:35 

*Music 60 min./week, PE 60 min./week, Library 30 min. Week 

 

 

“A full-time classroom teacher, day-in, day-out, is teaching 90 percent of their contract week. 

This leaves a mere 10 percent of time given to complete two remaining, yet fundamental, aspects of the role: feedback and planning. This places an incredible burden on that 10 percent – and leaves all other tasks to be completed in our own time. 

To reduce workload, we need to consider reducing the teaching load to one-third. That way, we could teach for 33 percent of the time and divide the remaining 66 percent between planning and feedback.” – Ross McGill

 

The starred (*) components above are meant to partially provide for some planning/feedback time. However, in reality, this planned time is often taken up by impromptu meetings, phone calls, bathroom breaks, problem-solving of some sort, etc.

 

 

 

  

 

 

As for the Why, it is common sense that all these standards are needed for the modern learner, or are they?  And why 180 days? And why Sept. – June? And why 9 to 4? 

 

How and When will we be able to accomplish the What? 

And again, Why? 


“When we no longer know what to do we have come to our real work and when we no longer know
which way to go we have begun our real journey. The mind that is not baffled is not employed. The impeded stream is the one that sings.”

Wendell Berry

Subscribe By Email

Get a weekly email of all new posts.

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.